Bali & Lombok Property Investment

Bali & Lombok Property Investment in: Compliance, Structure, and What Foreign Investors Must Get Right

The informal shortcuts that once shaped parts of Bali’s property market are no longer viable. Transactions that used to rely on assumptions, verbal assurances, or flexible interpretations of zoning and licensing now face firm administrative checks. The national government and local authorities have converged on a consistent approach: property-related investment is treated as a regulated business activity and must pass through standardized approvals.

For foreign investors, this shift reduces grey areas but raises the bar for preparation. The following guidance outlines what now governs feasibility, where projects commonly stall, and how to structure investments within Indonesia’s current regulatory framework.

A Different Starting Point: Treat Property as a Business, Not a Villa Purchase

The core change is conceptual. Accommodation, hospitality, and rental operations are recognized as commercial activities, not private ownership exercises. This means the pathway begins with establishing the correct business entity and permissions, not with a villa brochure or an architectural concept.

In practice, that requires:

• Entity formation: a PT PMA set up for the correct business line(s).
• Zoning confirmation (KKPR) for the intended use on the specific parcel.
• Environmental documentation scaled to project size and sensitivity.
• Building permissions through PBG and operational viability confirmed via SLF after completion.
• Sectoral licensing mapped to the actual model (hotel, villa rental, co‑living, etc.).

Attempting to run rentals through an asset held personally or via a structure not aligned to the activity will trigger problems—either during OSS submissions or later audits.

Zoning (KKPR) Comes First and Drives Everything Else

Feasibility now begins with spatial compliance. KKPR verification determines whether accommodation, tourism, or mixed-use development is even permissible. Without zoning conformity, downstream approvals will not proceed.

What this means for investors:

• No assumption of “flexibility.” Spatial plans are cross-checked digitally. Non-commercial zones cannot be repurposed informally.
• Setback and height rules apply. River, beach, and cultural protection areas are enforced. Height caps are respected in defined areas.
• District-level consistency. Local interpretations now align with provincial and national policy; outlier approvals are rare and risky to rely on.

Budgeting, design, and land negotiations should be sequenced after zoning suitability is confirmed in writing through the formal system.

Land Tenure and Control: Align Title, Use, and Registration

Foreign-controlled projects typically rely on long-term leasehold or corporate-held use rights. The legal structure should match the intended commercial activity and be properly recorded.

Points that now receive close attention:

• Title status and history. Unclear lineage, fragmented ownership, or undocumented boundaries will delay subsequent filings.
• Commercial use clauses. Leases and corporate title arrangements should explicitly allow the intended use.
• Consistency with KKPR. Conversions or upgrades (e.g., to HGB under a PT PMA) require proof that land use is permitted for the business activity.

Where documentation is incomplete, the risk is not just delay; it’s the possibility of being unable to obtain PBG/SLF and therefore being unable to operate legally.

Construction and Operation Require PBG and SLF, Not Legacy IMB

Indonesia has fully transitioned from the former IMB regime to PBG (building approval) during design/construction and SLF (building worthiness) for operation. Any building intended to host paying guests must pass both stages.

• PBG evaluates technical compliance before and during construction—structure, safety, setbacks, fire systems, building function, and other technical elements.
• SLF confirms the completed building matches approved plans and is safe to use for its declared function.

Without PBG and SLF, accommodation licensing, insurance, and commercial use are compromised. In audit situations, a non‑compliant building can face administrative sanctions that impact operations and revenue.

Environmental Documentation Scales With Scope and Location

Environmental compliance is not a uniform checklist. The required document—SPPL, UKL‑UPL, or AMDAL—depends on project size, operational impact, and site sensitivity.

• Smaller clusters may fit within SPPL, focusing on commitments to manage impacts.
• Mid-scale hospitality typically needs UKL‑UPL with defined controls for utilities, wastewater, waste, and noise.
• Larger or sensitive sites can trigger AMDAL, including baseline studies and mitigation plans.

The selected environmental path affects design (e.g., wastewater systems), construction methods, and ongoing obligations. Submitting the wrong category or treating it as an afterthought leads to resubmissions and redesign.

Business Licensing Under the Current Framework: Correct KBLI, Correct Scope

Under the current national licensing regime, a PT PMA must accurately reflect its actual activities through the correct KBLI classifications and obtain the corresponding sectoral licenses through OSS. Generic or mismatched KBLIs—common in earlier years—are flagged by the system and by inspectors.

For accommodation and related services, expect requirements tied to:

• Accommodation category and service standards.
• Safety, hygiene, and guest handling.
• Reporting to relevant authorities (including statistical and tax reporting).
• Alignment between declared business scope and what is offered to the market.

Operating outside the approved scope is a trigger for compliance action. Align the entity’s KBLIs, location, physical facilities, and marketing claims so they tell the same story.

---

Oversight Is Coordinated and Data-Driven

Authorities at the national, provincial, and district levels are using OSS and related systems to cross-check:

• Zoning approvals against location and use.
• PBG/SLF status against operating claims.
• Business classifications against actual activity.
• Tax and reporting compliance against occupancy patterns.

Informal rentals styled as “private stays” but marketed commercially are increasingly visible to regulators and platforms. The probability of intervention rises when operational data (bookings, payments, marketing) contradicts the legal framework on file.

Due Diligence Now Spans Legal, Technical, Spatial, and Operational Areas

A land search alone is insufficient. Robust due diligence integrates:

• Zoning feasibility: early-stage KKPR checks to avoid impossible sites.
• Title verification: status, boundaries, encumbrances, and intended use.
• Environmental pathway: confirmation of the applicable document and implications for design.
• Permitting route: PBG prerequisites, inspections, and SLF requirements.
• Licensing map: which KBLIs and operational licenses are required for the model.
• Local constraints: setbacks, access roads, utilities, and cultural considerations.

Findings should directly inform transaction terms, design scope, construction scheduling, and financial modeling.

Common Execution Bottlenecks (and How to Avoid Them)

1. Design before zoning. Starting architectural work or marketing without confirmed KKPR creates sunk costs and rework.
2. Title-use mismatch. Lease or title documents that do not authorize commercial use prevent licensing later.
3. Incorrect KBLI selection. Choosing catch-all or unrelated codes leads to OSS inconsistencies and audits.
4. Underestimating environmental obligations. Selecting SPPL when UKL‑UPL is required can derail timelines.
5. Skipping PBG during construction. Building first and “regularizing” later is unlikely to pass SLF scrutiny.
6. Fragmented documentation. Information in OSS, in contracts, and in marketing must be consistent. Inconsistencies invite review.

Address these early with a single compliance plan that integrates land, design, environment, construction, and operations.

How the OSS Platform Shapes the Process

OSS (Online Single Submission) has become the single reference point for approvals and company data. Key implications:

• If it isn’t in OSS, it effectively does not exist from an administrative standpoint.
• Application quality matters. Incomplete or inconsistent submissions extend timelines.
• Sequence is important. Trying to secure downstream licenses without upstream approvals results in rejection.

Keep records synchronized: company documents, zoning confirmations, environmental filings, PBG/SLF, and sectoral licenses should align in OSS and match the on‑ground reality.

---

Practical Sequence for an Accommodation or Rental Project

While each project differs, the following sequence reflects how compliant projects move:

1. High-level screening: location, indicative zoning, access, utilities, and preliminary constraints.
2. Entity planning: PT PMA structure and provisional KBLI mapping to the intended model.
3. KKPR submission: confirm zoning suitability for the target use before committing to design or purchase.
4. Site control and title verification: negotiate terms contingent on zoning and permitting outcomes; confirm permissible commercial use.
5. Environmental scoping: determine SPPL vs. UKL‑UPL vs. AMDAL, then integrate mitigation into design.
6. Concept and technical design: prepare documentation aligned to PBG requirements and environmental commitments.
7. PBG application and review: respond to technical notes and finalize approved drawings/specs.
8. Construction with compliance checks: build to approved plans; maintain records required for SLF.
9. SLF issuance: demonstrate conformity with PBG-approved plans and safety standards.
10. Operational licensing: finalize sectoral licenses in OSS that match the actual accommodation category and services.

This order reduces rework and clarifies timelines and cost exposure.

---

Financial Planning Considerations Under the Current Rules

Compliance influences CAPEX, OPEX, and project cash flow:

• Pre-construction period may be longer due to sequencing (KKPR → environmental → PBG). Budget for this runway.
• Design and engineering costs increase when aligning with PBG and environmental requirements, but reduce SLF risks.
• Infrastructure and utilities must meet operational standards; private systems (e.g., wastewater) may be mandatory.
• Insurance and lending increasingly require proof of PBG/SLF and correct licensing.
• Tax and reporting are tied to the declared business model; mismatches can impact both audit risk and valuation.

Build contingency around regulatory milestones, not just construction variables.

What This Means for Foreign Investors in 2025–2026

The regulatory environment favors structured, well-prepared projects. Key expectations:

• Documentation-led processes. Approvals rely on complete, consistent submissions.
• Limited tolerance for informal operations. Unlicensed rentals or mis-zoned projects face intervention.
• Higher standards for safety and environment. These are integral parts of viability, not optional extras.
• Predictability with preparation. While not necessarily faster, compliant projects face fewer surprises.

The advantage goes to investors who front-load feasibility checks and align all components—land control, design, environment, building approvals, and operations—under one coherent plan.

Build the Business First, Then the Building

Success in Bali’s current property environment depends on treating the investment as a regulated enterprise from day one. Start with zoning confirmation, align land use and title, choose the right KBLIs, scope environmental obligations accurately, and obtain PBG before breaking ground. After construction, secure SLF and finalize the operational license that reflects the real business model.

This approach removes avoidable risk, supports insurance and financing, and enables stable operations. The market is open to foreign capital, but it now expects discipline, documentation, and alignment at every stage.